<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are these really the &#8220;top 20&#8243; rock riffs?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rockandrollreport.com/are-these-really-the-top-20-rock-riffs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rockandrollreport.com/are-these-really-the-top-20-rock-riffs/</link>
	<description>The Rock and Roll Report is a place to go when you are tired of the same music played over and over on commercial rock radio. Playing great rock and roll from indie and unsigned bands.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:38:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: john smith</title>
		<link>http://rockandrollreport.com/are-these-really-the-top-20-rock-riffs/comment-page-1/#comment-894</link>
		<dc:creator>john smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2005 13:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://server1.oglethorpe.ca/~markrock/?p=1534#comment-894</guid>
		<description>Thats bull shit. Back in Black - AC/DC is defantly number 1. they hav left out thunderstuck ans so many other awwsome AC/DC songs. what is rage against the machine doing there. most od those songs gutiar is shit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats bull shit. Back in Black &#8211; AC/DC is defantly number 1. they hav left out thunderstuck ans so many other awwsome AC/DC songs. what is rage against the machine doing there. most od those songs gutiar is shit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

